Back of a black Puffco Peak Pro, zoomed into the light up logo showing both the glass and the base.
Black Puffco Peak Pro

Capitalism and innovation go hand in hand. With the onslaught of the cannabis industry, innovators across the globe began finding ways to get in on the green rush. When it comes to consumption, there are a litany of devices that have come along with the promise of taking your experience to the next level. Puffco is one of those brands, housing the industry-dominant Peak Pro. They recently won a lawsuit against more affordable devices manufactured by SHO Products, LLC., and the consequences of that loss are monumental for the brands involved.

SHO Products, LLC is identified as a manufacturer of popular vaporizer devices, specifically the Focus V Carta, Focus V Carta 2, and KandyPens Oura models, which were found to infringe on Puffco’s patent.

In the case Puff Corp. v. SHO Products, the court issued a Final Consent Judgment and Entry of Permanent Injunction on November 21, 2024.

According to the court’s order:

 

This means that starting July 19, 2025, SHO Products must cease all sales and distribution of the Focus V Carta 2 vaporizing device in the United States. The court also awarded Puffco a monetary judgment against the defendants, but it was thrown out due to Puffco’s lack of patent labelling on their packaging.  Focus V began raising funds and seeking investors shortly after the ruling, with over a quarter of a million dollars raised to date (and counting). 

Focus V Carta 2 and Sabre hot knife in Midnight Blue

 

What happens to the devices currently on the shelves? The ruling typically focuses on the manufacturers and wholesalers, not directly on retailers who have already purchased these products.

 

That said, retailers might still face some risks, such as:

  1. Potential liability for selling infringing products: Although the injunction mainly targets the manufacturers, retailers could potentially face legal challenges if they continue selling the infringing products after the court ruling, especially if they are aware of the infringement.
  2. Action by Puffco: If Puffco or another party involved in the case pursues further enforcement, retailers could be asked to stop selling the products or face legal action.

 

Other issues to flush out:

  1. Potential Supply Shortages: With the manufacturers being barred from selling new units, there could be a gap in the availability of similar quality products. This could lead to a rise in prices or a shift to alternative devices from other brands (have you seen the Dr. Dabber Switch2?!). 
  2. Brand Shifts: Other brands in the market might feel the ripple effects, especially if they manufacture similar devices. Some may take this as a cue to improve their designs and avoid patent infringement, while others might face legal challenges if their products are seen as too similar to Puffco’s patented devices. 
  3. Future Litigation: Consumers and businesses could see more lawsuits in the future as companies continue to protect their patent (i.e intellectual property). The case could lead to stricter enforcement across the industry, so everyone needs to be cautious about the legal status of the products they sell or purchase.

 

I DEFINITELY need to get my hands on a Carta 2 before that deadline! With all the devices out there, do you have a favorite? Let me know your go-to by shooting over an email, or DM me on socials!

Skip to content